Best of Streaming this week:The Fall and Rise of Reggie Dinkins
“靠山吃山唱山歌，靠海吃海念海经”。“十四五”时期，全国832个脱贫县均培育形成了2至3个优势突出、带动能力强的主导产业，总产值超过1.7万亿元。。业内人士推荐同城约会作为进阶阅读
。业内人士推荐91视频作为进阶阅读
Source: Computational Materials Science, Volume 267。服务器推荐是该领域的重要参考
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.